Home » Electronics » VisionTek Merchandise Radeon 7750 SFF 2GB GDDR5 4M Graphics Card 900798


Category : Electronics
Do not lose your chance to get this rare opportunity!
* Discount only for limited time, Buy it now!



"This Best Selling VisionTek Merchandise Radeon 7750 SFF 2GB GDDR5 4M Graphics Card 900798 Tends to SELL OUT VERY FAST! If this is a MUST HAVE product, be sure to Order Now to avoid disappointment!"

VisionTek Items Radeon 7750 SFF 2GB GDDR5 4M Graphics Card 900798

Solution Description
VisionTek 7750 eye 4 2GB GDDR5 PCI Specific Graphics Card is the trouble-free, high-functionality electronic signage remedy for retail, hospitality, business, healthcare, and far more. The electrical power to push up to four displays in unbiased, clone, or prolonged mode by means of a solitary Computer. Thanks to an power efficient style, the 7750 eye 4 demands only 70 watts of electrical power so it can be operate off the program power bus. With most programs featuring a factory-set up 350 watt or increased power source, you never have to acquire and install a more substantial electricity offer. The 7750 eye four uses 2GB of higher bandwidth GDDR5 memory to supply lag-cost-free content with the highest resolution feasible. Short Kind Element (SFF) design fits in modern Minimal Profile desktops and workstations by way of the limited bracket mounted on the card. The card is convertible to common ATX design with the integrated tall bracket for regular chassis as well. By incorporating Discrete Electronic Multi-Stage Audio technology into its chipset, the 7750 eye four is able to supply Hd seven.one surround seem independently to four shows by means of the four interfaces on the card. Gone is the need to have for multiple PCs and cards to offer audio to multiple displays. And, you never require a three.5mm mini-DIN cable to link to the motherboard. This consideration to depth to support business software use through the mini DisplayPort interface is unmatched by any other graphics card maker.

Cost: $199.99

  • AMD Eyefinity engineering multi-exhibit support for up to four displays
  • AMD Stream technology
  • Made for Immediate Compute eleven and OpenCL
  • Accelerated Video clip Transcoding (AVT). Core Velocity: 800MHz.
  • Compliant with DirectX eleven and earlier revisions
  • Advanced dynamic electrical power management with AMD Electricity Enjoy technology
  • 4 x 4K Cinematic mini DisplayPort Ports v 1.2 (4096 x 2160 for each port)
  • Supported Running Methods: Home windows 8.one, Home windows eight, Home windows seven, Home windows Vista, Home windows XP (all variations): Only supports two monitor show

Nikon comparison D300 vs D7100
be certain to view the comparison chart on Full Monitor

&nbsp

&nbsp

Okay. At 1st glimpse, this comparison may audio unfair. The D300,
featuring a twelve MP sensor was released in 2007, whilst the D7100,
featuring a 24 MP sensor was introduced almost six a long time afterwards in 2013.
6 many years. That is a prolonged time in the electronic globe.

&nbsp

&nbsp

PREFACE

But let us start from the commencing. I am, or at minimum was most of the
time, a extremely happy D300 person for much more than 5 a long time now. The camera
travelled from the darkest basements to considerably asian metropolitan areas and islands.
And I in no way regarded as it an choice to give absent my cam as it never ever unsuccessful,
by no means let me in the dark, by no means dissatisfied me. Following obtaining the D40 for a
calendar year just before heading to the D300 I was learning to appreciate the straight
and clean structure of the control factors on the D300. It is truly
uncomplicated. Shooting modes (P,M,S,A), ISO, WB, Publicity,
Aperture and a lot of far more important options can be extremely simply accessed
without at any time heading into the menu. Most settings are like keep the
certain configurations button whilst clicking the exposure dial thru the
option value variety. Release the button and it is established. Thats it. This
was a simple and straight approach what retained me a pleased man or woman for
years. Also with the high quality of the camera, specially its constructed
good quality &ndash total metal (magnesium alloy) body – and the haptic
feeling I was usually far more than pleased more than individuals years. For the
graphic high quality I was also really delighted. Other than, that occasionally I was
experience like wanting a bit far more resolution in scenario of higher cropping
was required as a shot was taken on a hurry with out fine adjusting of
the frame. On other events I was experience like seeking a lot more Higher
ISO with significantly less noise to shoot in the dim by hand. But as each of
those requests seemed like only possessing one particular reply, particularly going to
total-body (Fx-Format) I was fine with that. I was much more than frequently on
a holiday in a scenario have been I was exhausted to have close to my bulky
and large bag. Likely to full frame would not have meant to commit significantly
much more cash on lenses but also to have about an even bulkier and
far more heavier bag than the a single I am unwell of appropriate now. So on holiday getaway
you will see me frequently just with a digicam on my shoulder, getting my
35mm f/1.eight and thats it. I want nevertheless be capable to transfer. With out relocating,
there is not considerably various scenes you are likely to take in a day.
And if you will not have a car with you or a person who is pleased to have
your equipment (tripod, bag, umbrellas &hellip what else do you
need?) you really dont feel like transferring that considerably even though having all
that with you.

I don’t forget also one particular of my close close friends seeking me to change to Canon,
but this was also in no way an choice for me. Not only getting to change a
whole method of lenses, flashes and components, but I was and I am
appreciating the character of Nikon goods in all ways a good deal. Canon
cameras often arrive out with more recent features (Complete-Body-Sensors,
Video clip, …) or greater image quality a lot more quickly than Nikon ones. But to
me they by no means felt that reliable keeping them in my fingers as the Nikon
cameras. I experienced Canon Cameras in my hand which value far more than double
of the D300, but they constantly truly feel like inexpensive plastic to me. They
never ever feel that solid as I would commit that much cash on them. I
also have some recent designs of premium cars in my head in which
companies truly unsuccessful in inside supplies for +100k USD vehicles.
I never would heading to acquire those &ndash even I experienced the cash – as
they have low-cost plastic buttons on the command panel, in spite of of
currently being extremely awarded by the so named independent specialized push.

&nbsp

&nbsp

Typical Functions

Now get back again to our comparison. We have talked about cameras, right?

Apparently, as I have here now the D300 and the D7100, whereas the latter a single is
a midrange-client camera although the 1st 1 is a true rock-strong
prosumer digital camera. How does it arrive to that improve, or to that
comparison both?

Okay. Lets very first get a search, not at the differences of these the two cameras.
Let us get a appear of what they have in widespread. Equally are Nikon F-Mount
DSLRs with a DX-Sensor (crop element 1.3x). The two have the four fundamental
critical taking pictures modes &ndash P, M, S, A. The two have an HDMI output
on the still left and a Lcd on top. And the D7100 has at minimum a entire body which
is partly manufactured of magnesium alloy. Equally have a 100 % viewfinder
(.94x). Both can shoot 14-bit NEF’s, and each are that includes a
fifty one-point AF sensor and an AF-motor, so non AF-S lenses will have AF
function on each cams as nicely. The two can be geared up with a battery
grip, and if you just take a seem at the menus you may also find the two
cameras getting in depth options possibilities which is virtually the same
massive function record as soon as a lot more. And interestingly the D300s (the video clip
enabled succeeder of the D300) is available at nearly the identical price
proper now as the D7100 is.

&nbsp

&nbsp

Video

Let us just assume for a 2nd that the only attribute I am lacking on
my D300 is the online video. Specially on getaway there is often one thing
funny taking place you want to get a movie of, but typically that is not in
perfect mild situations. Smartphones just miss up having movies in dim
light-weight and they do not have any optical zoom. So for using just a
minor little bit serious video it might be a great feature to have on the
camera. But for purchasing a new camera with new funds the action from to
the D300s is just not much adequate for me. It does not attribute 1080p or
30fps video recording. And compared to the D300 there is just not
far more in the box ultimately than the video.

When investing income on a new digicam you want to have a lot more than just
1 function. I by no means believed ahead of that I am heading to go away this
super straight and reliable prosumer Nikon line &ndash not in favour
for a much less-pro merchandise line. But as it turns out, the D7100 has a lot
a lot more image depth and top quality providing in a deal which is even
lighter and far more straightforward to have than my old D300 and it is supplying me
1080p video clip, whilst spending even a minor considerably less than for the D300s
without having missing all individuals thorough menu settings and key functions.
Which is it. Mentioned like this, it sounds really straightforward.

&nbsp

&nbsp

Distinctions

Lastly, I want to position out, which functions you may well be missing in
situation you are likely for that identical &ldquoupgrade&rdquo as me, or
which attributes you may well obtain.

&nbsp

D300 havs, D7100 never havs
&nbsp-&nbsp flash sync plug (the aged round a single)
&nbsp-&nbsp round ten pin cable socket for remote cable shutter release and the older style GPS modules
&nbsp-&nbsp display include (shields your exhibit from scratches)
&nbsp-&nbsp simple controls
&nbsp-&nbsp CF card slot (big cards, simple to grab, but be cautious with the pins)
&nbsp-&nbsp guide pop up flash (it in no way fires until you launch it initial, no matter which plan &ndash that tends to make you seem much more wise than people men and women who are having images in the night of significantly objects
(like skylines) or capturing via home windows with accidently firing the flash )
&nbsp-&nbsp far more solid body
&nbsp-&nbsp even bigger prime Liquid crystal display
&nbsp-&nbsp greater entire body much more straightforward to grab (but also far more heavy)
&nbsp-&nbsp large capturing rate of up to 6/8 shots for every second (8 only with battery grip or sw tweak***)
&nbsp-&nbsp huge buffer area (will permit you carries on shooting of up to 18 RAWs (twelve-little bit) at six FPS with fast cards)
&nbsp-&nbsp Liquid crystal display display features a lot more practical tones and colors
&nbsp-&nbsp in camera preview is of higher high quality

&nbsp

D7100 havs, D300 do not havs
&nbsp-&nbsp 24 MP sensor
&nbsp-&nbsp Online video recording
&nbsp-&nbsp SD cards (hell are these tiny!)
&nbsp-&nbsp Dual SD card slots (2nd a single can be established to JPG, backup or overflow)
&nbsp-&nbsp IR sensor (for triggering the shutter)
&nbsp-&nbsp several taking pictures scene modes (your close friends who are not into images might be ready to get pictures as properly)
&nbsp-&nbsp flash pop up is controlled by software now (to disable the flash, be sure to choose the right settings 1st)
&nbsp-&nbsp taking pictures price at 6 pictures per next also for 14-bit NEFs (three on the D300), but as of the
&nbsp-&nbsp limited buffer area the burst rate drops dramatically (underneath 3 fps relying on your card) following 5 or 6 requires.
&nbsp-&nbsp assistance for more recent type GPS receivers and the Wifi-Adapter
&nbsp-&nbsp Liquid crystal display screen features adjustable backlight
&nbsp-&nbsp HDMI-C socket (HDMI-A-Cables want an adapter)

That is not a comprehensive checklist, but the largest variances I have
encountered so considerably.

&nbsp

&nbsp

Minimal Move FILTER

Finally one particular previous cease at the so called &ldquolow-go-filter&rdquo. I have
read through on a lot of sources on the world wide web that there is &ldquono important
variation&rdquo in photo depth by removing the low-pass-filter.
I can verify now although comparing each cameras that this is not accurate.
The D7100 one hundred% crops present definitely larger sharpness on the pixel
degree than the pictures from my D300. Certain, that effect can only be
observed even though obtaining a lens which is ready to provide that high
depth. Just look at the photos I took right here. Despite that DX primary lens’ tremendous
lower price tag tag, its in a position to produce this. And there are possibly far more
pricy key lenses offered which can even surpass this efficiency.

&nbsp

&nbsp

Screen

The back screen of the two cams are diverse, but I are not able to see any gain in circumstance of the D7100 LCDs in having an additional W-subpixel. If you place the cameras aspect by side you will simply notice that the hues and tones on the screen of the D300 are a lot more all-natural. The D7100 has an adjustable backlight now and a little little bit a lot more correct black. That is equally a in addition. But the photos on the D7100 look oversharped on playback. But the good news is this effects can only be observed on the display. The photos by itself on your memory card are of maximum high quality on the two cams.

Image playback on the D7100 over HDMI shows black bars on remaining and right side – even if you zoom in into the picture – this is some thing no person likes to see, especially as the D300 was ready to do that much better again then in 2007 previously. But Nikon is presently informed of that issue, and probably they are heading to fix that with a firmware update before long. I will publish an update here once they confirm me on that.

&nbsp

&nbsp

VERDICT

As for the total photograph quality there is not significantly huge distinction between equally cams. They perform virtually equivalent in conditions of dynamic variety and white balance. But when you have the correct lens mounted, the D7100 is the distinct winner in resolution and detail. Also in Low-Gentle scenarios the D7100 tends to protect a lot more specifics than the D300.

I read on many internet sites on the web that folks recommend the D300(s) as a far more reliable operating entire body for professionall photographers who get their 3000 photographs a week, but lastly I think that skilled photographers can pay for more current and more dear tools as the D4 for instance. So we are not talking about expert images here I guess.

I really appreciated the super sound physique and the straigthforward controls on the D300. But at the identical time I do not want to miss out on that resolution and depth plus on the D7100 any longer. If you are utilized to the controls on any prosumer Nikon it may require a tiny time to get utilised to the layout of the controls on the D7100, but that is practically nothing to fear about if you have that time. Also the smaller graphic buffer on the D7100 might be anything to take into account, as the burst fee just drops considerably much more early than on the D300. But if I am a style display photographer I not gonna settle for any drop in burst fee, even not the much better 1 on the D300. So thats yet another league for certain.

Last but not least, I think, that if you will not care about utilizing CF or SD playing cards, and if you never treatment about obtaining a digital camera human body entirely manufactured of metall alloy or 50 % synthetics, than the D7100 will give you a lot much more than just far more graphic detail. It will give you a more advanced focussing program, a lighter entire body, a second memory card slot and of program Movie. And all that for a extremely decent value tag. So for me it is genuinely an alternative even though not heading to Forex (far more weight, much more expensive lenses) but even now getting significant impression depth improvement and much more functions.

And as my pal Ivo says. It is a new toy to enjoy with as effectively for sure. 🙂
By d5e on 2014-03-02 17:26:15
tags

Wooww, nice product! I want to share this product!
facebook
twitter
stumbleupon
Delicious
reddit
Digg


What customers say about VisionTek Merchandise Radeon 7750 SFF 2GB GDDR5 4M Graphics Card 900798?

  1. 18 of 18 people found the following review helpful

    5.0 out of 5 stars
    Works great!, March 28, 2018

    By bob bruns (Carmichael, CA, US)

    Verified Purchase(What’s this?)

    This review is from: VisionTek Products Radeon 7750 SFF 2GB GDDR5 4M Graphics Card 900798 (Personal Computers)

    I’m going to write a detailed technical review here in the hopes that I can save somebody some time. My own mistakes cost me about two days.
    For personal reasons I recently consolidated three offices into one. Two of the offices had double monitors, one high-definition and one VGA. With the consolidation I ended up with many monitors and more computers that I have hands to operate. I decided to dispose of the computers and take the monitors and build myself a machine that had three high-definition monitors attached to it. I bought this card. First the basics. Digital standards for monitor video are HDMI, DisplayPort, and DVI. All these digital standards will run high-definition monitors well. The analog standard for video is VGA. I wasn’t happy with the quality of VGA with a large high definition widescreen monitor so I bought this card to get digital outputs for all the monitors. Now here’s where it gets tricky. DisplayPort is inherently an “active” standard, HDMI and DVI are inherently “passive.” Only two passive devices are allowed by Microsoft Windows. Since I do not own Displayport monitors, only HDMI and DVI, I had to purchase an “Active” mini-DisplayPort to DVI adapter to make my third monitor work. The first two monitors worked with mini-Displayport to HDMI adapters that were passive. The mini-Displayport to DVI adapters that are included with this card are passive.
    I still don’t understand the difference between active and passive adapters except the active adapters are about twice as expensive. But if you are like me you will need to add an active adapter to replace the passive DVI adapter found in the box.

    By the way I figured this out by calling this company’s tech support and they answered my question about 60 seconds. They gave me a part number I put it in Amazon and ordered the part before I even hung up the phone. This company’s technical support is wonderful, and a time when that is getting harder to find. It’s great that a company can answer the phone with a real person who fixes your problem right away.

    Other things about this card is it does come with a full size back panel adapter. You can change that out in about one minute. It was very easy to install, Windows found everything right away and it worked and now I have a browser in one display, word processor in the second, and email in the third. The fan noise is minimal. Nerdvana!

  2. 23 of 23 people found the following review helpful

    5.0 out of 5 stars
    Great Card–Notes on Cable Adapters & Monitors, December 30, 2016

    By eagle

    Verified Purchase(What’s this?)

    This review is from: VisionTek Products Radeon 7750 SFF 2GB GDDR5 4M Graphics Card 900798 (Personal Computers)

    Bought this about 4 months ago. Works great. I’ve got four 24″ monitors, and all work just fine. I don’t run high intensity games. I do run Photoshop and Illustrator.

    Lots of confusion by people who think they can plug in anything and it will work. Basically, you need to have a monitor with digital input, like DVI or DP. If you use non-digital inputs, like VGA, then you can only connect 2 monitors max (also, I could not get HDMI to work… maybe a cable issue). Ditto if you use an adapter or cable that is not “active”. But, if you use proper cables, then everything works just fine.

    That said, finding the right cable or adapter is a bit of a challenge. Here are a couple of items that are reasonably priced and that worked for me: (the card has mini-DP out, so I’m listing only the other connection)

    DVI : https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00EDSZYII
    DP : https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01J9SIBCC

    Note the manufacturer is the same on both items.

    Some side-notes on monitors. Invariably, if you buy this card, you’re probably going to buy some monitors, too…

    o Shop around. I found 24″ Dell monitors for $89 in Dec ’16–but not on Amazon!

    o Buy branded monitors. Off brands have issues: Bezel buttons don’t work well or wear out quickly; Colors are off; other weird stuff: monitors with VESA mounts that do not allow full removal of the pedestal. I’ve bought a few of these myself. There’s a reason why I now stick to branded stuff on this one.

    o All your monitiors should be the same brand and model–trust me, I’ve tried the buy one here and another one there (that’s why I know what connectors work), but different brands always will display colors differently and at different brightness.

    o Look at product close-ups for where the power and adjustment buttons are. I bought Benq before–great monitors & colors, but the power button is on the right side, around the bezel edge. So, if you put two of these next to each other, the right one will cover up the left one’s power button. Trust me, this gets annoying very quickly.

    o Bezel thickness matters! When you build a 4 or 6 monitor system, the thinner the bezel, the better it all looks in the end.

  3. 6 of 6 people found the following review helpful

    3.0 out of 5 stars
    It works, but KNOW THIS BEFORE YOU BUY!, June 29, 2018

    By Austin

    Verified Purchase(What’s this?)

    This review is from: VisionTek Products Radeon 7750 SFF 2GB GDDR5 4M Graphics Card 900798 (Personal Computers)

    First, this does indeed support four monitors. However, you will need to buy “Active” adapters if you want good 4k video quality. The included adapters are passive. You will also need to buy these if you want to support more than one 4k monitor. The manufacturer says it supports two 4k monitors with the included passive adapters, but that is wrong – it only supports one monitor at 4k resolution with the passive adapters (all other output will go out at 1080p).

    You must buy four active adapters if you want all your 4k monitors to have good quality with no lines cutting across your screen. I tried using one passive adapter with three active adapters and the 4k screen on the passive adapter had very poor quality with lines cutting across the middle.

    When I use four active adapters, the card works flawlessly. The image quality is beautiful.





Tags »

Microsoft 4N6-00001 Xbox Controller + Cable for Windows

Check Special Price!
Microsoft 4N6-00001 Xbox Controller + Cable for Windows Product DescriptionExperience the...

Alapmk Protecting Scenario Go over for fourteen” HP Pavilion x360 fourteen fourteen-baXXX 14m-baXXX (14m-ba000 to 14m-ba999,This sort of as 14M-BA114DX,Not fit Pavilion x360 fourteen 14-cdXXX & Pavilion 14 Collection) Notebook,Crimson

Check Special Price!
Alapmk Protecting Scenario Go over for fourteen” HP Pavilion x360 14...

ASUS GeForce GTX 1060 6GB Dual-fan OC Edition VR Ready Dual HDMI DP 1.4 Gaming Graphics Card (DUAL-GTX1060-O6G)

Check Special Price!
ASUS GeForce GTX 1060 6GB Dual-fan OC Edition VR Ready Dual...

Tribesigns Present day L-Shaped Desk Corner Laptop Desk Personal computer Notebook Research Desk Workstation Home Place of work Wood & Steel, Black

Check Special Price!
Tribesigns Contemporary L-Shaped Desk Corner Personal computer Desk Pc Laptop computer...

Online shopping from a great selection at Electronics Store